4. Friendly Fire

§4 Friendly fire

You may not allow other players to attack or conquer a village willingly if it does not clearly benefit the account being attacked or conquered. This includes villages you own or are sitting for. Being blackmailed into allowing a village to be attacked or conquered is also not permissible. All of the participants in the attack(s) may be punished.

Resources that have been placed in a village only for the purpose of being stolen are considered the same as resources that have been sent via the marketplace (§3). This does not apply to villages which are property of the attacking account.

Attacking accounts connected to your own account via the sitter function or ‘same pc usage’ is not permissible when there is no obvious benefit to the attacked account. This also applies to accounts in the same alliance.

-----------------------------------------------

§4.1 Conquering villages

It is impermissible to...

conquer a village belonging to an account for which you are or have been a sitter, unless two weeks have passed since canceling the sitter option.

conquer a village belonging to an account that has been sitting for you, unless two weeks have passed since canceling the sitter option.

conquer villages belonging to players entered as ‘same pc usage’, unless two weeks have passed since canceling the same pc usage.

conquer a village that has been part of your alliance, unless two days have passed since the account left the alliance.

conquer a village that is in your alliance or is in an alliance that is allied with your alliance.

** Oasis are excluded from this rule. **